We conducted comprehensive quantitative evaluations across five terrain types (Hilly, Forest, Ruin, Road, Indoor) with 2,500 procedurally generated point clouds. Each scenario includes 15% intentional occlusion to mimic real-world LiDAR limitations. Our method is benchmarked against classical SGP and elevation map (EM) baselines.
- Accuracy Improvements: FSGP-BGK lowers mean traversability error by 52.5% on hilly terrain and 37.9% on forest terrain relative to baseline SGP, while achieving the lowest variance across all categories.
- Scalability: Inducing-point ablations (50 vs. 500 points) reveal that BGK fusion sustains accuracy gains even with dense inducing sets, demonstrating robustness across different computational budgets.
- Computational Efficiency: Compared with elevation-map interpolation, FSGP-BGK achieves nearly three times faster runtime (33.84 ms vs. 107.85 ms) with reduced uncertainty.
- Temporal Consistency: Mean error steadily decreases over time, highlighting enhanced terrain estimation accuracy through integration of historical observations.